Go to MPEP - Table of Contents
1503.01 Specification [R-5] - 1500 Design Patents
1503.01 Specification [R-5]
37 CFR 1.153 Title, description and claim, oath or declaration.
(a) The title of the design must designate the particular article. No description, other than a reference to the drawing, is ordinarily required. The claim shall be in formal terms to the ornamental design for the article (specifying name) as shown, or as shown and described. More than one claim is neither required nor permitted.
(b) The oath or declaration required of the applicant must comply with § 1.63.
37 CFR 1.154 Arrangement of application elements in a design application.
(a) The elements of the design application, if applicable, should appear in the following order:
(1) Design application transmittal form.
(2) Fee transmittal form.
(3) Application data sheet (see § 1.76).
(4) Specification.
(5) Drawings or photographs.
(6) Executed oath or declaration (see § 1.153(b)).
(b) The specification should include the following sections in order:
(1) Preamble, stating the name of the applicant, title of the design, and a brief description of the nature and intended use of the article in which the design is embodied.
(2) Cross-reference to related applications (unless included in the application data sheet).
(3) Statement regarding federally sponsored research or development.
(4) Description of the figure or figures of the drawing.
(5) Feature description.
(6) A single claim.
(c) The text of the specification sections defined in paragraph (b) of this section, if applicable, should be preceded by a section heading in uppercase letters without underlining or bold type.
**>¶ 15.05 Design Patent Specification Arrangement
The following order or arrangement should be observed in framing a design patent specification:
(1) Preamble, stating name of the applicant, title of the design, and a brief description of the nature and intended use of the article in which the design is embodied.
(2) Cross-reference to related applications unless included in the application data sheet.
(3) Statement regarding federally sponsored research or development.
(4) Description of the figure or figures of the drawing.
(5) Descriptive statement, if any.
(6) A single claim.
><I. PREAMBLE AND TITLE
A preamble, if included, should state the name of the applicant, the title of the design, and a brief description of the nature and intended use of the article in which the design is embodied ( 37 CFR 1.154).
The title of the design identifies the article in which the design is embodied by the name generally known and used by the public but it does not define the scope of the claim. See MPEP § 1504.04, subsection I.A. The title may be directed to the entire article embodying the design while the claimed design shown in full lines in the drawings may be directed to only a portion of the article. However, the title may not be directed to less than the claimed design shown in full lines in the drawings. A title descriptive of the actual article aids the examiner in developing a complete field of search of the prior art and further aids in the proper assignment of new applications to the appropriate class, subclass, and patent examiner, and the proper classification of the patent upon allowance of the application. It also helps the public in understanding the nature and use of the article embodying the design after the patent has been issued. For example, a broad title such as "Adapter Ring" provides little or no information as to the nature and intended use of the article embodying the design. If a broad title is used, the description of the nature and intended use of the design may be incorporated into the preamble. Absent an amendment requesting deletion of the description, it would be printed on any patent that would issue.
When a design is embodied in an article having multiple functions or comprises multiple independent parts or articles that interact with each other, the title must clearly define them as a single entity, for example, combined or combination, set, pair, unit assembly.
Since 37 CFR 1.153 requires that the title must designate the particular article, and since the claim must be in formal terms to the "ornamental design for the article (specifying name) as shown, or as shown and described," the title and claim must correspond. When the title and claim do not correspond, the title should be objected to under 37 CFR 1.153 as not corresponding to the claim.
However, it is emphasized that, under the second paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112, the claim defines "the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention" (emphasis added); that is, the ornamental design to be embodied in or applied to an article. Thus, the examiner should afford the applicant substantial latitude in the language of the title/claim. The examiner should only require amendment of the title/claim if the language is clearly misdescriptive, inaccurate, or unclear (i.e., the language would result in a rejection of the claim under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph; see MPEP § 1504.04, subsection III). The use of language such as "or the like" or "or similar article" in the title when directed to the environment of the article embodying the design will not be the basis for a rejection of the claim under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. Such language is **>indefinite when it refers to the area of articles defining the subject matter of< the design. An acceptable title would be "door for cabinets, houses, or the like," while the title "door or the like" would be unacceptable and the claim will be rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. Ex parte Pappas, 23 USPQ2d 1636 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1992). See also MPEP § 1504.04; subsection III.
Amendments to the title, whether directed to the article in which the design is embodied or its environment, must have antecedent basis in the original disclosure and may not introduce new matter. Ex parte Strijland, 26 USPQ2d 1259 (Bd. Pat. App. & Inter. 1992). If an amendment to the title is directed to the environment in which the design is used and the amendment would introduce new matter, the amendment to the title must be objected to under 35 U.S.C. 132. If an amendment to the title is directed to the article in which the design is embodied and the amendment would introduce new matter, in addition to the objection under 35 U.S.C. 132, the claim must be rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph.
Any amendment to the language of the title should also be made at each occurrence thereof throughout the application, except in the oath or declaration. If the title of the article is not present in the original figure descriptions, it is not necessary to incorporate the title into the descriptions as part of any amendment to the language of the title.
¶ 15.05.01 Title of Design Invention
The title of a design being claimed must correspond to the name of the article in which the design is embodied or applied to. See MPEP § 1503.01.
¶ 15.59 Amend Title
For [1], the title [2] amended throughout the application, original oath or declaration excepted, to read: [3]
Examiner Note
1. In bracket 1, insert reason.
2. In bracket 2, insert --should be-- or --has been--.
II. DESCRIPTION
No description of the design in the specification beyond a brief description of the drawing is generally necessary, since as a rule the illustration in the drawing views is its own best description. >In re Freeman, 23 App. D.C. 226 (App. D.C. 1904).< However, while not required, such a description is not prohibited and may be incorporated, at applicant's option, into the specification or may be provided in a separate paper. >Ex parte Spiegel, 1919 C.D. 112, 268 O.G. 741 (Comm'r Pat. 1919).< Descriptions of the figures are not required to be written in any particular format, however, if they do not describe the views of the drawing clearly and accurately, the examiner should object to the unclear and/or inaccurate descriptions and suggest language which is more clearly descriptive of the views.
In addition to the figure descriptions, the following types of statements are permissible in the specification:
(A) Description of the appearance of portions of the claimed design which are not illustrated in the drawing disclosure. Such a description, if provided, must be in the design application as originally filed, and may not be added by way of amendment after the filing of the application as it would be considered new matter.
(B) Description disclaiming portions of the article not shown in the drawing as forming no part of the claimed design.
(C) Statement indicating the purpose of broken lines in the drawing, for example, environmental structure or boundaries that form no part of the design to be patented.
(D) Description denoting the nature and environmental use of the claimed design, if not included in the preamble pursuant to 37 CFR 1.154 and MPEP § 1503.01, subsection I.
It is the policy of the Office to attempt to resolve questions about the nature and intended use of the claimed design prior to examination by making a telephone inquiry at the time of initial docketing of the application. This will enable the application to be properly classified and docketed to the appropriate examiner and to be searched when the application comes up for examination in its normal course without the need for a rejection under 35 U.S.C. 112 prior to a search of the prior art. Explanation of the nature and intended use of the article may be added to the specification provided it does not constitute new matter. It may alternately, at applicant's option, be submitted in a separate paper without amendment of the specification.
(E) A "characteristic features" statement describing a particular feature of the design that is considered by applicant to be a feature of novelty or nonobviousness over the prior art ( 37 CFR 1.71(c)).
This type of statement may not serve as a basis for determining patentability by an examiner. In determining the patentability of a design, it is the overall appearance of the claimed design which must be taken into consideration. In re Rosen, 673 F.2d 388, 213 USPQ 347 (CCPA 1982); In re Leslie, 547 F.2d 116, 192 USPQ 427 (CCPA 1977). Furthermore, the inclusion of such a statement in the specification is at the option of applicant and will not be suggested by the examiner.
¶ 15.47 Characteristic Feature Statement
A "characteristic features" statement describing a particular feature of novelty or nonobviousness in the claimed design may be permissible in the specification. Such a statement should be in terms such as "The characteristic feature of the design resides in [1]," or if combined with one of the Figure descriptions, in terms such as "the characteristic feature of which resides in [2]." While consideration of the claim goes to the total or overall appearance, the use of a "characteristic feature" statement may serve later to limit the claim (McGrady v. Aspenglas Corp., 487 F. Supp. 859, 208 USPQ 242 (S.D.N.Y. 1980)).
Examiner Note
In brackets 1 and 2, insert brief but accurate description of the feature of novelty or nonobviousness of the claimed design.
¶ 15.47.01 Feature Statement Caution
The inclusion of a feature statement in the specification is noted. However, the patentability of the claimed design is not based on the specified feature but rather on a comparison of the overall appearance of the design with the prior art. In re Leslie, 547 F.2d 116, 192 USPQ 427 (CCPA 1977).
The following types of statements are not permissible in the specification:
(A) A disclaimer statement directed to any portion of the claimed design that is shown in solid lines in the drawings is not permitted in the specification of an issued design patent. However, the disclaimer statement may be included in the design application as originally filed to provide antecedent basis for a future amendment. See Ex parte Remington, 114 O.G. 761, 1905 C.D. 28 (Comm'r Pat. 1904); In re Blum, 374 F.2d 904, 153 USPQ 177 (CCPA 1967).
(B) Statements which describe or suggest other embodiments of the claimed design which are not illustrated in the drawing disclosure, except one that is a mirror image of that shown or has a shape and appearance that would be evident from the one shown, are not permitted in the specification of an issued design patent. However, such statements may be included in the design application as originally filed to provide antecedent basis for a future amendment. In addition, statements which attempt to broaden the scope of the claimed design beyond that which is shown in the drawings are not permitted.
(C) Statements describing matters *>that< are directed to function >or are< unrelated to the design.
¶ 15.41 Functional, Structural Features Not Considered
Attention is directed to the fact that design patent applications are concerned solely with the ornamental appearance of an article of manufacture. The functional and/or structural features stressed by applicant in the papers are of no concern in design cases, and are neither permitted nor required. Function and structure fall under the realm of utility patent applications.
**>¶ 15.46.01 Impermissible Descriptive Statement
The descriptive statement included in the specification is impermissible because [1]. See MPEP § 1503.01, subsection II. Therefore, the description should be canceled as any description of the design in the specification, other than a brief description of the drawing, is generally not necessary, since as a general rule, the illustration in the drawing views is its own best description.
Examiner Note
In bracket 1, insert the reason why the descriptive statement is improper.
<¶ 15.60 Amend All Figure Descriptions
For [1], the figure descriptions [2] amended to read: [3]
Examiner Note
1. In bracket 1, insert reason.
2. In bracket 2, insert --should be-- or --have been-.
3. In bracket 3, insert amended text.
¶ 15.61 Amend Selected Figure Descriptions
For [1], the description(s) of Fig(s). [2] [3] amended to read: [4]
Examiner Note
1. In bracket 1, insert reason.
2. In bracket 2, insert selected Figure descriptions.
3. In bracket 3, insert --should be-- or --have been-.
4. In bracket 4, insert amended text.
III. DESIGN CLAIM
The requirements for utility claims specified in 37 CFR 1.75 do not apply to design claims. Instead, the form and content of a design claim is set forth in 37 CFR 1.153:
37 CFR 1.153 ... claim...
(a) ... The claim shall be in formal terms to the ornamental design for the article (specifying name) as shown or as shown and described. More than one claim is neither required nor permitted.
*****
A design patent application may only include a single claim. The single claim should normally be in formal terms to "The ornamental design for (the article which embodies the design or to which it is applied) as shown." The description of the article in the claim should be consistent in terminology with the title of the invention. See MPEP § 1503.01, subsection I.
When the specification includes a proper **>descriptive statement< of the design (see MPEP § 1503.01, subsection II), or a proper showing of modified forms of the design or other descriptive matter has been included in the specification, the words "and described" must be added to the claim following the term "shown"; i.e., the claim must read "The ornamental design for (the article which embodies the design or to which it is applied) as shown and described."
**>Full lines in the drawing show the claimed design. Broken lines are used for numerous purposes. Under some circumstances, broken lines are used to illustrate the claimed design (i.e., stitching and fold lines). Broken lines are not permitted for the purpose of identifying portions of the claimed design which are immaterial or unimportant. See In re Blum, 374 F.2d 904, 907, 153 USPQ 177, 180 (CCPA 1967) (there are "no portions of a design which are 'immaterial' or 'not important.' A design is a unitary thing and all of its portions are material in that they contribute to the appearance which constitutes the design."). See also MPEP § 1503.02, subsection III.<
¶ 15.62 Amend Claim "As Shown"
For proper form ( 37 CFR 1.153), the claim [1] amended to read: "[2] claim: The ornamental design for [3] as shown."
Examiner Note
1. In bracket 1, insert --must be--.
2. In bracket 2, insert --I-- or --We--.
3. In bracket 3, insert title of the article in which the design is embodied or applied.
¶ 15.63 Amend Claim "As Shown and Described"
For proper form ( 37 CFR 1.153), the claim [1] amended to read: "[2] claim: The ornamental design for [3] as shown and described."
Examiner Note
1. In bracket 1, insert --must be--.
2. In bracket 2, insert --I-- or --We--.
3. In bracket 3, insert title of the article in which the design is embodied or applied.
¶ 15.64 Addition of "And Described" to Claim
Because of [1] -- and described -- [2] added to the claim after "shown."
Examiner Note
1. In bracket 1, insert reason.
2. In bracket 2, insert --must be--.
Go to MPEP - Table of Contents